Epstein Secrets

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

as enacted to protect the safety of individuals involved in law enforcement investigations." ACLU v. DOD, 389 F. Supp. 2d 547, 576 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). Application of Exemption 7(F) "is appropriate . . . where disclosure of identifying information would put the life and physical safety of law enforcement agents and other third

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

as enacted to protect the safety of individuals involved in law enforcement investigations." ACLU v. DOD, 389 F. Supp. 2d 547, 576 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). Application of Exemption 7(F) "is appropriate . . . where disclosure of identifying information would put the life and physical safety of law enforcement agents and other third

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

as enacted to protect the safety of individuals involved in law enforcement investigations." ACLU v. DOD, 389 F. Supp. 2d 547, 576 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). Application of Exemption 7(F) "is appropriate . . . where disclosure of identifying information would put the life and physical safety of law enforcement agents and other third