Epstein Secrets

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

commonly known procedures may be protected from disclosure if the disclosure could reduce or nullify their effectiveness," Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep 7 of Conunerce,337 F. Supp. 2d 146, 181 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 EFTA00071579 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 27 of 30 As indicated on the BOP index, some

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

commonly known procedures may be protected from disclosure if the disclosure could reduce or nullify their effectiveness," Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep 7 of Conunerce,337 F. Supp. 2d 146, 181 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 EFTA00075462 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 27 of 30 As indicated on the BOP index, some

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

commonly known procedures may be protected from disclosure if the disclosure could reduce or nullify their effectiveness," Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep 7 of Conunerce,337 F. Supp. 2d 146, 181 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 EFTA00088696 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 27 of 30 As indicated on the BOP index, some