Epstein Secrets

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

28 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (quotation marks and brackets omitted); see ACLU v. DOJ, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); NAACP Legal Def. & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. Dell? of Haus. & Urban Dev., No. 07 Civ. 3378 (GEL), 2007 WL 4233008, at *11 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2007) ("Draft documents, by the

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

28 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (quotation marks and brackets omitted); see ACLU v. DOJ, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); NAACP Legal Def. & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. Dell? of Haus. & Urban Dev., No. 07 Civ. 3378 (GEL), 2007 WL 4233008, at *11 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2007) ("Draft documents, by the

No. 13-CV-7360 (JPO), 2015 WL 5459713 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015), Judge Oetken concluded that Williams did not require the per se rule, did not adopt the Tenth Circuit's per se rule for BOP records, and followed a "practical approach," observing that "[t]he ordinary understanding of the term [law enforcement] includ

28 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (quotation marks and brackets omitted); see ACLU v. DOJ, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); NAACP Legal Def. & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. Dell? of Haus. & Urban Dev., No. 07 Civ. 3378 (GEL), 2007 WL 4233008, at *11 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2007) ("Draft documents, by the