Epstein Secrets

e documents appear to be largely factual in nature and therefore are not subject to a blanket withholding under Exemption 5. (Pl.'s Br., at 19); see Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473, 482 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Purely factual material not reflecting the agency's deliberative process is not protected.")

neral explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone do not satisfy the foreseeable harm standard. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93, 100 (D.D.C. 2019); see also N.Y. Times Co v. Dep't of Health and Human Sews., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267, at *30-31 (S.D.N.Y. J

e documents appear to be largely factual in nature and therefore are not subject to a blanket withholding under Exemption 5. (Pl.'s Br., at 19); see Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473, 482 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Purely factual material not reflecting the agency's deliberative process is not protected.")

neral explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone do not satisfy the foreseeable harm standard. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93, 100 (D.D.C. 2019); see also N.Y. Times Co v. Dep't of Health and Human Sews., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267, at *30-31 (S.D.N.Y. J

e documents appear to be largely factual in nature and therefore are not subject to a blanket withholding under Exemption 5. (Pl.'s Br., at 19); see Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473, 482 (2d Cir. 1999) ("Purely factual material not reflecting the agency's deliberative process is not protected.")

neral explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone do not satisfy the foreseeable harm standard. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93, 100 (D.D.C. 2019); see also N.Y. Times Co v. Dep't of Health and Human Sews., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267, at *30-31 (S.D.N.Y. J