Epstein Secrets

0/21 Page 9 of 15 criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of

han recite the boilerplate rationale for protecting deliberative documents. (Gov't Reply Br., at 17-18.) That is not enough. In order to satisfy the Amendment's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S

0/21 Page 9 of 15 criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of

han recite the boilerplate rationale for protecting deliberative documents. (Gov't Reply Br., at 17-18.) That is not enough. In order to satisfy the Amendment's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S

0/21 Page 9 of 15 criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of

han recite the boilerplate rationale for protecting deliberative documents. (Gov't Reply Br., at 17-18.) That is not enough. In order to satisfy the Amendment's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S