Epstein Secrets

to the defendants—they fall short of actually connecting these specific types of records to any of those concerns. (See Capone Decl. 18-22, 24-25; Supplemental Decl. of Russell Capone, ECF No. 40 [hereinafter "Capone Supp. Decl."], at ¶¶ 6-7, 10-13). Generic concerns that some administrative documents in some ca

neral explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone do not satisfy the foreseeable harm standard. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93, 100 (D.D.C. 2019); see also N.Y. Times Co v. Dep't of Health and Human Sews., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267, at *30-31 (S.D.N.Y. J

to the defendants—they fall short of actually connecting these specific types of records to any of those concerns. (See Capone Decl. 18-22, 24-25; Supplemental Decl. of Russell Capone, ECF No. 40 [hereinafter "Capone Supp. Decl."], at ¶¶ 6-7, 10-13). Generic concerns that some administrative documents in some ca

neral explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone do not satisfy the foreseeable harm standard. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93, 100 (D.D.C. 2019); see also N.Y. Times Co v. Dep't of Health and Human Sews., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267, at *30-31 (S.D.N.Y. J

age to the defendants—they fall short of actually connecting these specific types of records to any of those concerns. (See Decl. ¶¶ 18-22, 24-25; Supplemental Decl. of Russell ECF No. 40 [hereinafter a Supp. Decl."], at ¶¶ 6-7, 10-13). Generic concerns that some administrative documents in some cases may int

neral explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone do not satisfy the foreseeable harm standard. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93, 100 (D.D.C. 2019); see also N.Y. Times Co v. Dep't of Health and Human Sews., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267, at *30-31 (S.D.N.Y. J