Epstein Secrets

ent's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enft, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167637, at *33 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2020). "General explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone d

0/21 Page 9 of 15 criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of

ent's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enft, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167637, at *33 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2020). "General explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone d

0/21 Page 9 of 15 criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of

ent's standard, BOP "must explain how a particular Exemption 5 withholding would harm [its] deliberative process." Nat? Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enft, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167637, at *33 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2020). "General explanations" that disclosure would impair or chill deliberations alone d

0/21 Page 9 of 15 criminal case to an unfair trial." United States v. Martoma, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182959, at *22 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2013) (citing Neb. Press Ass'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of