Epstein Secrets

l URLs, case numbers, case categories, subject identification numbers, and internal identifying codes and departure statuses."); Bishop v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 45 F. Supp. 3d 380, 388-89 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (affirming use of Exemption 7(E) to withhold codes returned from agency database searches and collecti

aintiff stating that it was withholding records pursuant to exemptions 3, 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(D), and 7(E). These documents are not described on the Vaughn Index because that would reveal the number of pages being withheld categorically, and therefore, they are not being specifically discussed in this

other words, Exemption 7(A) in not included in the face of the documents that were processed prior to July 2019, but the Exemption is noted on the Vaughn Index. Seidel Decl. ¶ 48, Ex. EE. After Epstein's arrest, the FBI confirmed that the additional release of responsive material could negatively imp

FTA00105600 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 3 of 15 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Am. Immigration Lawyers Ass 'n v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66 (D.D.C. 2012) 10 Assoc. Press v. Dep't of Del, 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009) 5, 9 Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D.D.C.

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re

FTA00071610 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 3 of 15 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Am. Immigration Lawyers Ass 'n v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66 (D.D.C. 2012) 10 Assoc. Press v. Dep't of Del, 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009) 5, 9 Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D.D.C.

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re

FTA00088561 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 3 of 15 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Am. Immigration Lawyers Ass 'n v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66 (D.D.C. 2012) 10 Assoc. Press v. Dep't of Del, 554 F.3d 274 (2d Cir. 2009) 5, 9 Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75 (D.D.C.

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re