Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
are of "very limited value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New
ourt of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; Linkevicius v Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Lithuania [2006] EWHC 3481 (Admin) at para. 17; and Crean v Government of I
ON ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL Overview 1. This Opinion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern Distri
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
are of "very limited value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New
ourt of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; Linkevicius v Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Lithuania [2006] EWHC 3481 (Admin) at para. 17; and Crean v Government of I
ON ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL Overview 1. This Opinion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern Distri
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
are of "very limited value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New
ourt of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; Linkevicius v Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Lithuania [2006] EWHC 3481 (Admin) at para. 17; and Crean v Government of I
ON ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL Overview 1. This Opinion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern Distri
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (89)
Entities connected to both Carolina Gomes and Peters Solicitors LLP
United States
LOCATION6 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Michael Cohen
PERSON6 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
AH
Ahmad
PERSON5 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Henderson
LOCATION5 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON5 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
High Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Bermingham
LOCATION4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Blackstone
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
SA
Sanchez
PERSON4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Northern Ireland
LOCATION4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Russia
LOCATION4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
the Cayman Islands
LOCATION4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
EJ
Eason Jeffers
PERSON4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
Christian R. Everdell
PERSON4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
the Serious Fraud Office
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
MC
Mark S. Cohen
PERSON4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
AD
Adeagbo
PERSON4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
KA
Kakis
PERSON4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters
DE
Dewani
PERSON4 w/ Carolina·3 w/ Peters