Epstein Secrets

aint. Significant to this case and Epstein having probable cause to continue with this suit against Edwards was Judge Crow's finding when he denied Edwards' Motion to Dismiss Epstein's Second Amended Complaint. Edwards' Motion to Dismiss asserted the litigation privilege as an absolute bar to Epstein's cause of

alm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [fax] By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Many (FBN 26680) Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Eps

d the NPA and there was no legitimate purpose for them to make the agreement public. Furthermore, the CVRA court had recently (February 2009) denied Edwards' Motion to Unseal the NPA in that action. (Jane Doe v. U.S., Case No. 08-CV-80736, D.E. 36.) Edwards wants the Court to believe, however, that Epstein's mo

levard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] By: Is___ l Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN Angela M. Many (FBN Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein S

t to avoid the Florida Evidence Code by propounding the tardy discovery requests should be rejected. CONCLUSION Epstein respectfully requests that Edwards' Motion be denied. Edwards asked for confirmation of the pretrial deadlines and must be held to that request. There was no court ruling "on motions current

ACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [fax] By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN Angela M. Many (FBN Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein S