Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt , 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra : There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohi
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt , 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra : There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohi
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
made is under twenty-one. United Stalest Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra: There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohib
ver agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Eleven
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857524_p6
e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (1 1 th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra: There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohib
Page: EFTA02857524_p6 →Page EFTA02857524_p11
ver agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Eleven
Page: EFTA02857524_p11 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857732_p4
e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt , 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra : There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohi
Page: EFTA02857732_p4 →Page EFTA02857732_p6
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
Page: EFTA02857732_p6 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857763_p4
e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt , 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra : There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohi
Page: EFTA02857763_p4 →Page EFTA02857763_p6
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
Page: EFTA02857763_p6 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p4
e is under twenty-one. United States v. Pruitt , 763 F.2d 1256, 1261 (11th Cir. 1985). In reaching this decision, the Eleventh Circuit relied upon the Third Circuit's Hamilton decision, supra : There is, however, a precise analogue to this statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 et seq. (White Slave Traffic Act), which prohi
Page: EFTA02857810_p4 →Page EFTA02857810_p6
er agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Georgia, the signals to the agent's cell phone had to pass through VoiceStream's Jacksonville, Florida switching center. The defendant argued that he did not know or intend that the call pass in interstate commerce. The Elevent
Page: EFTA02857810_p6 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (163)
Entities connected to both the Third Circuit's and VoiceStream
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON10 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
United States
LOCATION10 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
LB
Leon Black
PERSON8 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
Philadelphia
LOCATION8 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
Marc Rich
PERSON9 w/ the·8 w/ VoiceStream
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON8 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
RB
Roy Black
PERSON8 w/ the·8 w/ VoiceStream
GA
Garcia-Lopez
PERSON7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
Robert Maxwell
PERSON7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
EL
Ellis
PERSON7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
Naomi Campbell
PERSON7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
the Sentencing Commission
ORGANIZATION7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
ME
Meacham
PERSON7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
JB
Janusz Banasiak
PERSON7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
Jencks
PERSON7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION9 w/ the·7 w/ VoiceStream
Strevell
ORGANIZATION7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
Offense Instr
ORGANIZATION7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream
DR
Drury
PERSON7 w/ the·9 w/ VoiceStream