Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubers need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
the proper interpretation of evidence, "it is not the Court's role to resolve the dispute through exclusion of one of the expert's opinions." In re Digital Musk Antitrust Litig., 321 F.R.D. 64, 80 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). Moreover, Dr. Rocchio addressed these contrary articles during the Daubert hearing, identifying points of agr
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubers need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
the proper interpretation of evidence, "it is not the Court's role to resolve the dispute through exclusion of one of the expert's opinions." In re Digital Musk Antitrust Litig., 321 F.R.D. 64, 80 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). Moreover, Dr. Rocchio addressed these contrary articles during the Daubert hearing, identifying points of agr
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
). In particular, not every expert admissible under Daubers need rely on a method that conforms with "the exactness of hard science methodologies." E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 07-CV-8383 (LAP), 2010 WL 3466370, at *13-14 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2010) (quoting United States v. Simmons, 470 F.3d 1115, 1123 (5th Cir. 2006)).
the proper interpretation of evidence, "it is not the Court's role to resolve the dispute through exclusion of one of the expert's opinions." In re Digital Musk Antitrust Litig., 321 F.R.D. 64, 80 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). Moreover, Dr. Rocchio addressed these contrary articles during the Daubert hearing, identifying points of agr
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (40)
Entities connected to both E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P. and Digital Musk Antitrust Litig
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON7 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON7 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Russell Simmons
PERSON7 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION7 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION7 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
DA
Daubert
PERSON7 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
LR
Lisa Rocchio
PERSON7 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION7 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Alto v. Sun Pharm
ORGANIZATION6 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON6 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
USDC SONY
ORGANIZATION6 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
United States
LOCATION6 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Raymond
PERSON3 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
FU
Furman
PERSON3 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
RA
Randall
PERSON3 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
the Seventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION3 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Torres
PERSON3 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
CA
Castillo
PERSON3 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON3 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital
Tenth Circuit
ORGANIZATION3 w/ E.E.O.C.·3 w/ Digital