Epstein Secrets

time Edwards filed his motion to set case for trial, the case was not at issue, and thus, Epstein's case against Rothstein may not proceed based on Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440. (App. 15). Rule 1.440 provides: (a) When at Issue. An action is at issue after any motions directed to the last pleading served

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottin er LL Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik Nurik ard, Suite 700 01 ounse or e e nt Scott Rothstein Ja

BECAUSE THE CIRCUIT COURT MUST REMOVE THE CASE FROM THE TRIAL DOCKET IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE MANDATE SET FORTH IN RULE 1.440. In violation of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440, this case was not "at issue" when Edwards filed his Motion to Set Case for Trial. Therefore, the circuit court's ensuing Order set

ey J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 1 o- ounse or ee ant Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottin er LLC o- ounse or ee nt ounter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik . Nurik yard, Suite 700 01 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein

ivilege log that this Court's predecessor, The Honorable David Crow, found to be insufficient on its face and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Edwards has claimed that none of the documents on the dis

ip M. Burlington Nichole J. Segal Burlin on & Rockenbach, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottin er LLC Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaint& Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothst