Epstein Secrets

VE ORDER AND IN LIMINE OF UNRELATED SETTLEMENTS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), moves for a protective order pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(c) on the production and disclosure of any additional confidential settlement agreements and amounts and moves in limine pursuant to

13 14 15 16 a7 a8 I19 20 21 22 23 24 25 But I'm pretty sure that some cases were filed by Mr. Josefsberg. THE COURT: Thank you. Ms. Rockenbach, so as far as the collateral claims are concerned -- by no means am I minimizing those by using that terminology. It's just to distinguish the th

otion filed by 5 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE Epstein to remove the case from the trial 6 By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE ^ docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil 9 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: Procedure 1.440 first. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Yo

-2995 EFTA00793881 5 7 2 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 IS 15 20 21 22 23 24 25 an order in that regard, please. All right, Ms. Rockenbach. MS. RoCEENBACH: Thank you. Hay it please the Court. Good morning. Your Honor mentioned the barrage that the Court has received. And it's the exa

ement. If a settlement is reached, it shall be the responsibility of the attorneys or parties to reduce the agreement to writing and to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.730(6), unless waived. B. The Plaintiff's attorney shall be responsible for scheduling mediation. The parties should agree on a mediat

adv. Epstein Case No. 502009CA040800)OOCXMBAG Response in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Amend Exhibit List. COUNSEL LIST Scott J. Link, Esq. Kara Rockenbach, E Link & Rockenbach, 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Pho Faxral. Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack A. G

ify them on his Exhibit List. Edwards has provided not a single reason why this Court should expedite its careful review and enforce the mandate of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440 (Petition for Writ of Mandamus) and determine if the severance of the interrelated and dependent actions should continue to one jur

exhibits to the trial 6 EFTA00793722 court's attention: "So I again want to make clear that I'm finding absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss Campbell or anyone else from the Link and Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did. . ." (App. D-2, 61:15-18.) Indisputably, it was Epstein

ivilege log that this Court's predecessor, The Honorable David Crow, found to be insufficient on its face and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Edwards has claimed that none of the documents on the dis

ou've done your job." (March 8, 2018, Aft. Tr. 59:1-4.)5 • "So I again want to make clear that I'm finding absolutely no fault with Mr. Link, Miss Rockenbach, Miss Campbell or anyone else from the Link and Rockenbach firm in terms of what they did, albeit in the manner in which they had to do it and the