Epstein Secrets

ICHOLE J. SEGAL Florida Bar No. 41232 /kbt 29 EFTA00808547 SERVICE LIST Epstein v. Rothstein/Edwards Case No. 4D18-0762 Scott J. Link, Esq. Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esq. Rachel J. Glasser, Esq. LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Ste. 301 h, Florida 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack A.

ATE OF SERVICE 29 ii EFTA00808516 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES PAGE Abrams v. Paul, 453 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) 17 Alamo Rent-A-Car v. Mancusi, 24 632 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 1994) Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc., 19 492 So.2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

likely default by Rothstein, the identical allegations will be terminated in Epstein's favor, a directly opposite result). See Alamo Rent-A-Car v. Mancusi, 632 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 1994). Thus, Edwards's malicious prosecution claim was not a compulsory counter-claim and would at best be considered a permi

2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Angela M. Man FBN 26680 Primary: Primary: Primary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Secondary: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff1Coun

in's position this will allow the jury to better understand why they are being instructed on probable cause, malice, etc.; Alamo Rent-A-Car Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352 (Fla. 1994); Rivernider v. Meyer, 174 So. 3d 602 (Fla. 46 DCA 2015); Hickman v. Barclay's Intl Realty, Inc., 16 So. 3d 154, 155 (Fl

NICHOLE J. SEGAL Florida Bar No. 41232 /kbt 2 EFTA00798168 SERVICE LIST Epstein v. Rothstein/Edwards Case No. 4D18-0762 Scott J. Link, Esq. Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esq. Rachel J. Glasser, Esq. LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Ste. 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Ep

, the facts this Court will consider when it determines whether Defendant has proved Plaintiff lacked probable cause. See Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Mancusi, 632 So. 2d 1352, 1357 (Fla. 1994) (jury decides disputed issues of fact, but court determines whether those facts establish probable cause) (citati