Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization
September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at I. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator—[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in a the NPA." Id. Individual I was named and feat
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization
September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at I. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator—[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in a the NPA." Id. Individual I was named and feat
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization
September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at I. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator—[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in a the NPA." Id. Individual I was named and feat
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ra 389 F.3d 309, 321 n.7 (2d Cir. 2004) "District courts [are afforded] wide discretion regarding the scope of such hearings ...." United Siates v. Bartok, 472 F. App'x 25, 27 (2d Cir. 2012). E. The Presumption of Remand in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 Cases A 18 U.S.C. § 1591 case involving sexual victimization
September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at I. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator—[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in a the NPA." Id. Individual I was named and feat
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both Bartok and I. The Government
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON19 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON7 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
George Mitchell
PERSON7 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
Oliver Stone
PERSON8 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
James Baker
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
New York
LOCATION6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
New York City
LOCATION7 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
Michael Jackson
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·5 w/ I.
the New York State Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
Palm Beach Police Incident Report
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
Larry Celona
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
NY Post Article
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
Defense Counsel/District
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
CBS 12 News
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.
Palm Beach
LOCATION6 w/ Bartok·4 w/ I.