Epstein Secrets

tion and Failure to Replace Him with Another Inmate 51 A. Notice on August 8 of the Impending Transfer of Epstein's Cellmate on August 9 51 B. MCC New York Staff Reject Epstein Attorney's Request that Epstein be Housed Without a Cellmate 51 C. Removal on August 9 of Epstein's Cellmate from MCC New York 5

ralized Control Center. Access into the SHU was further controlled by a second locked door (Main Interior Entry Door), to which a limited number of Correctional Officers (CO) had keys while on duty. Secondary access to the SHU was controlled by a locked door. That door was opened remotely by a staff member in the centra

................................. 51 A. Notice on August 8 of the Impending Transfer of Epstein’s Cellmate on August 9 .................... 51 B. MCC New York Staff Reject Epstein Attorney’s Request that Epstein be Housed Without a Cellmate ........................................................................

alized Control Center. Access into the SHU was further controlled by a second locked door (Main Interior Entry Door), to which a limited number of Correctional Officers (CO) had keys while on duty. Secondary access to the SHU was controlled by a locked door. That door was opened remotely by a staff member in the centr

tion and Failure to Replace Him with Another Inmate 51 A. Notice on August 8 of the Impending Transfer of Epstein's Cellmate on August 9 51 B. MCC New York Staff Reject Epstein Attorney's Request that Epstein be Housed Without a Cellmate 51 C. Removal on August 9 of Epstein's Cellmate from MCC New York 5

ralized Control Center. Access into the SHU was further controlled by a second locked door (Main Interior Entry Door), to which a limited number of Correctional Officers (CO) had keys while on duty. Secondary access to the SHU was controlled by a locked door. That door was opened remotely by a staff member in the centra