Epstein Secrets

., 926 F.2d 1197, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1991). An agency's search may be reasonable even if it does not return every responsive document. See Adamowicz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). An agency must only search those "files likely to contain responsive materials (if such records exist)."

ORITIES Cases ACLU v. DOD, Page(s) 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 21, 22 ACLU v. DOI, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20

92), but lbJecause the DOJ is an agency specializing in law enforcement, its claim of a law enforcement purpose is entitled to deference," Ctr. for Nat'l Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dep't of Justice,331 F.3d 918, 926 Exemption 7(A) also protects records that, if released, could interfere with post-trial criminal

., 926 F.2d 1197, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1991). An agency's search may be reasonable even if it does not return every responsive document. See Adamowicz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). An agency must only search those "files likely to contain responsive materials (if such records exist)."

ORITIES Cases ACLU v. DOD, Page(s) 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 21, 22 ACLU v. DOI, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20

92), but lbJecause the DOJ is an agency specializing in law enforcement, its claim of a law enforcement purpose is entitled to deference," Ctr. for Nat'l Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dep't of Justice,331 F.3d 918, 926 Exemption 7(A) also protects records that, if released, could interfere with post-trial criminal

., 926 F.2d 1197, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1991). An agency's search may be reasonable even if it does not return every responsive document. See Adamowicz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). An agency must only search those "files likely to contain responsive materials (if such records exist)."

ORITIES Cases ACLU v. DOD, Page(s) 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 21, 22 ACLU v. DOI, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20

92), but lbJecause the DOJ is an agency specializing in law enforcement, its claim of a law enforcement purpose is entitled to deference," Ctr. for Nat'l Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dep't of Justice,331 F.3d 918, 926 Exemption 7(A) also protects records that, if released, could interfere with post-trial criminal