Epstein Secrets

., 926 F.2d 1197, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1991). An agency's search may be reasonable even if it does not return every responsive document. See Adamowicz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). An agency must only search those "files likely to contain responsive materials (if such records exist)."

ORITIES Cases ACLU v. DOD, Page(s) 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 21, 22 ACLU v. DOI, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20

56 U.S. 595, 602 (1982). Under Exemption 6, a court considers whether the "public interest in disclosure outweighs the individual privacy concerns." Nat'l Assoc. of Hoinebuilders v. Norton, 309 F.3d 26, 35 (D.C. Cr. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). But the "only relevant public interest in disclosu

., 926 F.2d 1197, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1991). An agency's search may be reasonable even if it does not return every responsive document. See Adamowicz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). An agency must only search those "files likely to contain responsive materials (if such records exist)."

ORITIES Cases ACLU v. DOD, Page(s) 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 21, 22 ACLU v. DOI, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20

56 U.S. 595, 602 (1982). Under Exemption 6, a court considers whether the "public interest in disclosure outweighs the individual privacy concerns." Nat'l Assoc. of Hoinebuilders v. Norton, 309 F.3d 26, 35 (D.C. Cr. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). But the "only relevant public interest in disclosu

., 926 F.2d 1197, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1991). An agency's search may be reasonable even if it does not return every responsive document. See Adamowicz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). An agency must only search those "files likely to contain responsive materials (if such records exist)."

ORITIES Cases ACLU v. DOD, Page(s) 389 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) 21, 22 ACLU v. DOI, 844 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2016) 15, 16 Adamowitz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 5 Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678 (2d Cir. 2010) 20

56 U.S. 595, 602 (1982). Under Exemption 6, a court considers whether the "public interest in disclosure outweighs the individual privacy concerns." Nat'l Assoc. of Hoinebuilders v. Norton, 309 F.3d 26, 35 (D.C. Cr. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). But the "only relevant public interest in disclosu

C., 926 F.2d 1197, 328 (D.C. Cir. 1991). An agency'ssearch may be reasonable even if it does not return every responsive document. See Adamowicz v. I.R.S., 552 F. Supp. 2d 355, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). An agency must only search Because an agency declaration can satisfy the government's burden on a motion

56 U.S. 595, 602 (1982). Under Exemption 6, a court considers whether the "public interest in disclosure outweighs the individual privacy concerns." Nat'l Assoc. of Homebuilders v. Norton, 309 F.3d 26, 35 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). But the "onlyrelevant public interest in disclosur