Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell where Government obtained an in
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell where Government obtained an in
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell where Government obtained an in
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell where Government obtained an in
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Productions, Inc. and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
MA
Martindell
PERSON12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Statistical Tabulating Corp.
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
David Boies
PERSON12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
BO
Botha
PERSON12 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
SW
Sweet
PERSON11 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Kendall Coffey
PERSON10 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Colorado
LOCATION10 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Oregon
LOCATION10 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Hastings
PERSON10 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Figueroa
PERSON10 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Jennings
PERSON10 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Productions,·4 w/ N.Y.