Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
as well as the appropriate method of statistical comparison. See Rioux, 97 F.3d at 656. Here, the defendant contends that the relevant jury pool is the White Plains Qualified Wheel. (Def. Mot. 9 at 5-6). The Government believes that the relevant jury pool is the White Plains Master Wheel, but, as set forth belo
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
as well as the appropriate method of statistical comparison. See Rioux, 97 F.3d at 656. Here, the defendant contends that the relevant jury pool is the White Plains Qualified Wheel. (Def. Mot. 9 at 5-6). The Government believes that the relevant jury pool is the White Plains Master Wheel, but, as set forth belo
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
as well as the appropriate method of statistical comparison. See Rioux, 97 F.3d at 656. Here, the defendant contends that the relevant jury pool is the White Plains Qualified Wheel. (Def. Mot. 9 at 5-6). The Government believes that the relevant jury pool is the White Plains Master Wheel, but, as set forth belo
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
as well as the appropriate method of statistical comparison. See Rioux, 97 F.3d at 656. Here, the defendant contends that the relevant jury pool is the White Plains Qualified Wheel. (Def. Mot. 9 at 5-6). The Government believes that the relevant jury pool is the White Plains Master Wheel, but, as set forth belo
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (122)
Entities connected to both the White Plains and Cir.2010
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ the·8 w/ Cir.2010
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON8 w/ the·6 w/ Cir.2010
United States
LOCATION5 w/ the·8 w/ Cir.2010
LB
Leon Black
PERSON8 w/ the·5 w/ Cir.2010
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON8 w/ the·5 w/ Cir.2010
Bronx
LOCATION8 w/ the·5 w/ Cir.2010
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
Orange
LOCATION8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
the White Plains Division
ORGANIZATION8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
DU
Duren
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
Dutchess
LOCATION8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
Putnam
LOCATION8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
KE
Kenny
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
Jackman
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
SU
Sullivan
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
Westchester
LOCATION8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
Louisiana
LOCATION8 w/ the·4 w/ Cir.2010
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·6 w/ Cir.2010
Torres
PERSON5 w/ the·6 w/ Cir.2010
John F. Kennedy
PERSON5 w/ the·6 w/ Cir.2010