Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)); United States v. Serrano, No. 13 Cr.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Herring v. United States and Fourth Amendment
United States
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·6 w/ Fourth
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Herring·6 w/ Fourth
AL
Alfonso
PERSON4 w/ Herring·6 w/ Fourth
Resendiz-Ponce
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Herring·6 w/ Fourth
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON4 w/ Herring·6 w/ Fourth
Estrada
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Herring·6 w/ Fourth
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON4 w/ Herring·6 w/ Fourth
Julie K. Brown
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
Michael Jackson
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
DB
Doug Band
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
Chris Tucker
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
United Kingdom
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
Murray
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
JO
Joinder
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
Kendall Coffey
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
David Boies
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
Colorado
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
Oregon
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth
Hastings
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ Fourth