Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
es not . . `have to specify evidence or details of how the offence was committed.' United States v. Wey, No. 15 Cr. 611 (MN), 2017 WL 237651, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan, 18, 2017) (emphasis in original) (quoting United States v. Coffey, 361 F. Supp. 2d 102, 111 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). "When the charges in an indictment h
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
es not . . `have to specify evidence or details of how the offence was committed.' United States v. Wey, No. 15 Cr. 611 (MN), 2017 WL 237651, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan, 18, 2017) (emphasis in original) (quoting United States v. Coffey, 361 F. Supp. 2d 102, 111 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). "When the charges in an indictment h
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
does not . . `have to specify evidence or details of how the offence was committed.'" United States v. Wey, 15 Cr. 611 (AJN), 2017 WL 237651, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan, 18, 2017) (emphasis in original) (quoting Untied States v. Coffey, 361 F. Supp. 2d 102, III (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). "When the charges in an indictment h
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
not . . `have to specify evidence or details of how the offence was committed.'" United States v. Wey, No. 15 Cr. 611 (AJN), 2017 WL 237651, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan, 18, 2017) (emphasis in original) (quoting United States v. Coffey, 361 F. Supp. 2d 102, 111 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). "When the charges in an indictment h
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Herring v. United States and S.D.N.Y. Jan
BL
Blakney
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Adriana Ross
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Stephen Hawking
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Kentucky
LOCATION4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
SC
Schaefer
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
ST
Strohm
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
VI
Vilar
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
YL
Ying Lin
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
RA
R. App
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
OP
Orange" Prod.
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
PS
Palmieri v. State
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
RA
Rakas
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
RA
Rawlings
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
BY
Blum v. Yaretsky
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
AO
Albright v. Oliver
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
RO
Rochin
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
FD
Franks v. Delaware
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.
PO
Potamitis
PERSON4 w/ Herring·5 w/ S.D.N.Y.