Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Rawlings and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
United States
LOCATION7 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
United Kingdom
LOCATION6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Murphy
PERSON6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Mason
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
TH
Thompson
PERSON6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Anderson
PERSON6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON6 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Kendall Coffey
PERSON5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
David Boies
PERSON5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Colorado
LOCATION5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Oregon
LOCATION5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Hastings
PERSON5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Figueroa
PERSON5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Jennings
PERSON5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.
North Carolina
LOCATION5 w/ Rawlings·4 w/ N.Y.