Epstein Secrets

eless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]self'). That footnote is too slender a reed to support Maxwell's en

aw principles that apply to conflicting state laws. Annabi is the binding law of this Circuit, and this Court must apply it. 14 EFTA00077646 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution Even if the NPA bound this District—which it does not—the NPA provides no basis for dismissing the Indictment. The NPA does not pr

eless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]self'). That footnote is too slender a reed to support Maxwell's en

aw principles that apply to conflicting state laws. Annabi is the binding law of this Circuit, and this Court must apply it. 14 EFTA00039461 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution Even if the NPA bound this District—which it does not—the NPA provides no basis for dismissing the Indictment. The NPA does not pr

eless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]self'). That footnote is too slender a reed to support Maxwell's en

aw principles that apply to conflicting state laws. Annabi is the binding law of this Circuit, and this Court must apply it. 14 EFTA00095106 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution Even if the NPA bound this District—which it does not—the NPA provides no basis for dismissing the Indictment. The NPA does not pr

eless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]self'). That footnote is too slender a reed to support Maxwell's en

aw principles that apply to conflicting state laws. Annabi is the binding law of this Circuit, and this Court must apply it. 14 EFTA00103039 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution Even if the NPA bound this District—which it does not—the NPA provides no basis for dismissing the Indictment. The NPA does not pr