Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
pson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorvee, 616 F.3d 174, 180 (2d Cir. 2010) ("We do not believe that the district court was clearly erroneous in finding, as a matter of fact, that these imag
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00100116 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
pson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorvee, 616 F.3d 174, 180 (2d Cir. 2010) ("We do not believe that the district court was clearly erroneous in finding, as a matter of fact, that these imag
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00077781 VII.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
pson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorvee, 616 F.3d 174, 180 (2d Cir. 2010) ("We do not believe that the district court was clearly erroneous in finding, as a matter of fact, that these imag
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00039596 VII.
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
pson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorvee, 616 F.3d 174, 180 (2d Cir. 2010) ("We do not believe that the district court was clearly erroneous in finding, as a matter of fact, that these imag
wyer is called "on a significant issue other than on behalf of the client, and it is apparent that the testimony may be prejudicial to the client." N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b); see generally Murray v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 583 F.3d 173, 177-80 (2d Cir. 2009) (discussing the advocate-witness rule). 149 EFTA00103174 VII.
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Dorvee and N.Y. R.P.C. 3.7(b
United States
LOCATION11 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON11 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON11 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
DI
DiGregorio
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
GH
Ghavami
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Triumph Capital Group, Inc.
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Michael Jackson
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
CH
Chuang
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
DE
DeFilippo
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
DE
Dewar
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Bin Laden
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
LA
Lahey
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
KO
Kozel
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
Martinez
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
HE
Heyward
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
OL
Olivieri
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.
BO
Botha
PERSON10 w/ Dorvee·4 w/ N.Y.