Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041, at *27 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007)); see also United States v. DeFilippo, No. 17 Cr. 585 (WHP), 2018 WL 740727, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2018) ("As courts in this Circuit have recognized, it is not shocking that every af
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature ofcell phone location records," which
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041, at *27 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007)); see also United States v. DeFilippo, No. 17 Cr. 585 (WHP), 2018 WL 740727, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2018) ("As courts in this Circuit have recognized, it is not shocking that every af
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041, at *27 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007)); see also United States v. DeFilippo, No. 17 Cr. 585 (WHP), 2018 WL 740727, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2018) ("As courts in this Circuit have recognized, it is not shocking that every af
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D.N.Y. 2013) (quoting United States v. Vilar, No. 05 Cr. 621 (KMK), 2007 WL 1075041, at *27 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2007)); see also United States v. DeFilippo, No. 17 Cr. 585 (WHP), 2018 WL 740727, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2018) ("As courts in this Circuit have recognized, it is not shocking that every af
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both DeFilippo and the Carpenter Court
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON11 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON11 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
DI
DiGregorio
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
DO
Dorvee
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
GH
Ghavami
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
Triumph Capital Group, Inc.
ORGANIZATION10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
CH
Chuang
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
DE
Dewar
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
Bin Laden
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
LA
Lahey
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
KO
Kozel
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
Martinez
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
HE
Heyward
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
OL
Olivieri
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the
BO
Botha
PERSON10 w/ DeFilippo·4 w/ the