Epstein Secrets

Gmal - Request RF TRAt4siliSSICAS A L CROCA411QC1 ,NHOME ° P. VIC" (ST EVENT - PRA SER 114 ski& •-p) RaerriciasuiP 7-1 M Gmail vi Cr; ti a Pearce RN° euerstr- Gazes EIS O.4,1-0,06 IniAdskri MM IMP 7 ELA t I 11 1 VZ C /I Request EA./ft ficrmies eads l AyeA",a i t4 '116 To: Narungga EO

SA Health. In 2016 I obtained a Letter of Involvement from the Regional Development Board, listing the Business advisors involved and submitted both Letters of Involvement to the Intellectual Property Lawyer, Johnson Lawyers, John James, who then denied the involvement of Roger Kirchner in the Medical Business Plans d

T 2601 CONFIDENTIAL MR MICHAEL PHELAN, APM AUSTRALIAN CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE COMMISSION 28th January 2022 Dear Mr Michael Phelan, APM, Ja ueline Pearce I am contacting you in addition to my previous contact dated 29th December 2021, regarding the supplied reports and USB files containing the constr

n the two business developments obtained directly from the parties involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, John James the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvement were

00269230 8/25/22, 2:37 PM Small - Your enquiry to the eSafety Commissioner [SEC=OFFICIALSensitive aa Gmail RicocAreisED AS Raph)te .c, c,pame Pearce cat Mt NHL Ac-11%; cry Your enquiry to the eSafe : ensitive] 1 message Online To: Jacque in 24 August 202 at 09:11 Dear Thank you for your in

ort Pirie SA. Johnson Lawyers - John James - Contesting Intellectual Property Theft May 2013 Denial of Roger Kirchner's involvement after providing Letters of Involvement supplied by Roger Kirchner. EFTA00269271

Criminal Division 1st Andrews Plaza New York City NY 10007 Confidential Criminal Division 2nd November 2022 To whom it may concern, Jac ueline Pearce a aroo Ines Kadina SA 5554 I am contacting you concerning recent contact dated 3rd October 2022 and reporting that I am a direct target of Epstei

n the two business developments obtained directly from the parties involved and was seeking legal representation. Following submitting the official Letters of Involvement to the contacted lawyer of Johnson Lawyers, the lawyer denied the individuals contained within the Official Letters of Involvemen were involved or