Epstein Secrets

y judgment on its second cause of action in the second amended complaint for an order ejecting defendants Diane Fisher alkla The Fisher Group ("Ms. Fisher") and Ron Soifer ("Soifer") a from the premises known as (the "premises"). STATEMENT OF FACTS Government's Protection Of Premises The premises at

overnment learned that a number of persons and entities other than the original defendants potentially asserted possessory claims to the Premises as Fisher's subtenants ( see Nakano Dec. ¶ 3). The Government then sought leave to amend the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 to name Fisher's subten

(a). Following the severance of diplomatic ties between the United States and Iran, OFM took custody of the premises pursuant to the FMA, the VCCR, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq . ("IEEPA"), authorities thereunder and a license granted to OFM by the Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets Cont

ssions ("OFM") of the United States Department of State (the "State Department") against defendants Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Epstein"), Ivan S. Fisher ("Fisher"), Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a The Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, Lawrence D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbrun,

ssession of the Premises to the Government. Defendant Fisher is a resident of the State of New York and is an unapproved subtenant of the Premises. Fisher has availed himself of the use and benefits of the Premises and has failed to surrender possession of the Premises to the Government. Defendant Elly

protected and preserved the Premises at all times relevant to this suit pursuant to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations ("VCCR"), the FMA, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq . ("IEEPA"), and authorities thereunder. PARTIES The plaintiff is the United States of America on behalf of its agency, t

y judgment on its second cause of action in the second amended complaint for an order ejecting defendants Diane Fisher alk/a The Fisher Group ("Ms. Fisher") and Ron Soifer ("Soifer") a from the premises known as 34 East 69th Street, New York, New York (the "premises"). STATEMENT OF FACTS A. Governme

overnment learned that a number of persons and entities other than the original defendants potentially asserted possessory claims to the Premises as Fisher's subtenants ( see Nakano Dec. ¶ 3). The Government then sought leave to amend the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 to name Fisher's subten

(a). Following the severance of diplomatic ties between the United States and Iran, OFM took custody of the premises pursuant to the FMA, the VCCR, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. § 1701 el seq . ("IEEPA"), authorities thereunder and a license granted to OFM by the Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets Cont

a Capitol police officer during the Jan. 6 riot on the U.S. Capitol. According to the article, Joseph Fisher's attorney said, in a statement, "Mr. Fisher anticipated pleading guilty to the indictment as charged, without a plea agreement." A hearing will take place in January or February. The article a

ned $20,000 for illegally sending computer servers to Iran. The article detailed that Tourino, along with his company, Spectra, and others, violated the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by purchasing and sending servers to Iran without the required licenses from January 2014 to July 2017. The article explained that the serv