Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
against him"; and the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell wh
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature ofcell phone location records," which
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
against him"; and the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell wh
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
against him"; and the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell wh
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
against him"; and the Government did not seek the deposition "to aid it in a criminal investigation or grand jury proceeding." Id. at 700; see also Botha v. Don King Productions, Inc., No. 97 Civ. 7587 (JGK), 1998 WL 88745 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 1998) (noting importance of policy concerns of Martindell wh
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Botha and the Carpenter Court
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON24 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION19 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON18 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
ST
Stokes
PERSON14 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
MA
Martindell
PERSON13 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON13 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON13 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
Productions, Inc.
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
WE
Werner
PERSON12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
Statistical Tabulating Corp.
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
SW
Sweet
PERSON12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
David Boies
PERSON12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
FI
Fisher
PERSON12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON12 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Botha·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON11 w/ Botha·4 w/ the