Epstein Secrets

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

y apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00799386 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

y apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585357 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

ly apparent, production of the 6 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE Th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585378 requested information is required. Calderbank v. Cazares, 435 So.2d 377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Specifically, Edwards has sued Epstein for Malicious Prosecution, and as a result is claiming damages, includin