Epstein Secrets

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

rey Epstein as to Bradley Edwards through intemet searches. 27. Provide an explanation for your belief that law enforcement is still investigating the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Identify contacts with govemment/law enforcement, media, other attorneys, or anyone else from which you claim to form this belief,

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

rey Epstein as to Bradley Edwards through intemet searches. 27. Provide an explanation for your belief that law enforcement is still investigating the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Identify contacts with govemment/law enforcement, media, other attorneys, or anyone else from which you claim to form this belief,

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

rey Epstein as to Bradley Edwards through intemet searches. 27. Provide an explanation for your belief that law enforcement is still investigating the Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. Identify contacts with govemment/law enforcement, media, other attorneys, or anyone else from which you claim to form this belief,