Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00710448

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: > on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

r qualify anything that is unmanifest. This measuring proving and qualifying are attributes of Ahamkara, or ego. Which is one step up the chain from Manas, or mind, known as the computer of the senses. Here it can only make connections and conjectures. Science also deals in abstractions, which are bas

EFTA00821616

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

we" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

EFTA00821662

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

e" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21July 2016 03:11:04 To Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the prop

Mutual Connections (75)

Entities connected to both Brad Bartholomew ‹ and Manas

Stephen Hawking

Harvey Weinstein

Jerico