Epstein Secrets

" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: > on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

rs (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar EFTA00710456 —Original Message— From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

we" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

enerates numbers (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar —Original Message-- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 12:56 pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are

e" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21July 2016 03:11:04 To Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the prop

s (bits) not consciousness. A computer has no self, free will or awareness of its own. Regards Avtar EFTA00821671 —Original Message-- From: Dr. Mike Sosteric To: online_sadhu_sanga Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2016 : pm Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness As for consciousness the fact is that we are re