Epstein Secrets

" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: > on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

nature—My form, qualities, activities and pastimes are all transcendental, but unwise persons cannot know the truth, and they think, "The formless Brahman took birth in Vasudeva's cell as an ordinary human being." Sri-bhagavan uvaca mayy aveSya mano ye m5rh nitya-yukta upasate traddhaya parayopetas

we" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

nature—My form, qualities, activities and pastimes are all transcendental, but unwise persons cannot know the truth, and they think, "The formless Brahman took birth in Vasudeva's cell as an ordinary human being." Sa-bhagavan uvaca mayy avetya mano ye math nitya-yukta upa sate .raddhaya parayopetas

e" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21July 2016 03:11:04 To Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the prop

nature—My form, qualities, activities and pastimes are all transcendental, but unwise persons cannot know the truth, and they think, "The formless Brahman took birth in Vasudeva's cell as an ordinary human being." tri-bhagavan uvaca mayy avetya mano ye math nitya-yukta upasate .raddhaya parayopetas