Epstein Secrets

" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: > on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

it not, there is great loss. Hence, seeing (the Real) in all beings, wise men become immortal on departing from this world.' Kena Upanisad 2:2-5 (Radhakrishnan 1953) And so the conversations unfolds as seekers of knowledge. Thank you for including me on this chain of inquiry. I am humbled and honored. ICa

we" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21 July 2016 03:11:04 To: Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the pr

it not, there is great loss. Hence, seeing (the Real) in all beings, wise men become immortal on departing from this world.' Kena Upanisad 2:2-5 (Radhakrishnan 1953) And so the conversations unfolds as seekers of knowledge. Thank you for including me on this chain of inquiry. I am humbled and honored. Kar

e" are all confused now, "we" will all be confused in the future. What kind of scientist would accept a proposition like that? From: on behalf of Brad Bartholomew ‹ > Sent: 21July 2016 03:11:04 To Subject: Re: SV: [Sadhu Sanga] Consciousness Dear Soren & Witt I think most scientists would agree with the prop

it not, there is great loss. Hence, seeing (the Real) in all beings, wise men become immortal on departing from this world.' Kena Upanisad 2:2-5 (Radhakrishnan 1953) And so the conversations unfolds as seekers of knowledge. Thank you for including me on this chain of inquiry. I am humbled and honored. Kar