Epstein Secrets

ts on a disc, not sexual abuse claims. Simply, the Intervenors seek money damages for significant emotional distress because a disc sat in a box in Fowler White's files for eight years. Because the Intervenors appear to have failed to present this Court with requisite proof of their damages, this Court can eit

ourt to summarily deny the Intervenors' claims, particularly after this Court provided them with ample opportunity to support them with the ordered Summary of Damages. Instead of providing a factual basis and support for their claims, the Intervenors' Summary of Damages conclude that, "Epstein and his counsel have

ein and D. Indyke re same; work on objection to duces tecum; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; communications with J. lanno re Fowler White's insurance information 06/19/18 RJG Review Notice and Re-Notice of taking Video 1.90 750.50 Deposition Duces Tecum of J. Epstein, Bankruptcy Cou

Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings 06/27/18 SJL Work on Response to B. Edwards' and Farmer 8.20 6,150.00 Jaffe's Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings; follow up with M. Weinberg and J. Goldberg r

ein and D. Indyke re same; work on objection to duces tecum; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; communications with J. lanno re Fowler White's insurance information 06/19/18 RJG Review Notice and Re-Notice of taking Video 1.90 750.50 Deposition Duces Tecum of J. Epstein, Bankruptcy Cou

Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings 06/27/18 SJL Work on Response to B. Edwards' and Farmer 8.20 6,150.00 Jaffe's Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on proposed Orders for upcoming hearings; follow up with M. Weinberg and J. Goldberg r