Epstein Secrets

n any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

violation of a federal bankruptcy court order. See Supplement to Edwards' Mot. to Strike, Exhibit B at pp. 1-3. In particular, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of Florida entered an explicit order that Epstein's attorneys (at the Fowler White law firm)

oluntarily dismiss Epstein. They said the limited discovery they had performed made clear that any violation in respect to Epstein was the result of Fowler White's wrongdoing. The dispute arises from what Edwards' counsel Jack Scaroia described Friday as the "extraordinary circumstance" surrounding the Novembe

ett PA, which used to represent him, retained copies of another firm's confidential documents in violation of a court order. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray reserved judgment after hearing testimony from witnesses during a lengthy hearing for Florida-based Fowler White to show why it should not be held

finding whether Fowler White or Epstein retained any copies of the documents contained on the disc or any images of the documents in the memories of Fowler White's copiers. Following a preliminary hearing held on April 13, 2018, in the Bankruptcy Court, Judge Ray ordered discovery that is focused on the allega

as occurred. The issue of compliance by Fowler White and/or Epstein with the Bankruptcy Court's November 2010 Agreed Order, issued by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray (the "November 2010 Agreed Order"), is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for t

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

h 7, 2018, Edwards filed his Supplement to the Motion to Strike, which identified a Federal Court Order issued on November 30, 2010 by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, prohibiting Epstein's prior counsel, Fowler White, from creating or ret

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1194 Filed 11/30/10 Page 1 of 2 ORDERED/1k Sogdian District of Florida ea /1-.9e)-18 Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Cart UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Fort Lauderdale Division www sh.uscourts. go v

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1194 Filed 11/30/10 Page 1 of 2 ORDERED/1k Sogdian District of Florida ea /1-.9e)-18 Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Cart UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Fort Lauderdale Division www sh.uscourts. go v

bid. He also ordered them to file a summary of their alleged damages with the court. The judge also decided during the hearing to order Epstein and Fowler White's corporate representative to sit for depositions on the limited scope of how Epstein and his current counsel came to possess a compact disc allegedl

contempt of court for allegedly retaining copies of another firm's confidential documents in violation of the court's order. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray said in his eight-page ruling that the recently disbanded South Florida firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards FiStOS & Lehrman PL had made sufficie

bate stamped pages of documents. Rather, Special Master Carney wanted a searchable disc. It is still a mystery how and when the disc came back into Fowler White's possession after it was sent to Special Master Carney and no evidence has been presented to resolve that question definitively. 5Excerpts of the Ma

ion was completed. Additionally, The Honorable Donald W. Hafele's stated interest in first allowing the Show Cause proceedings before The Honorable Raymond B. Ray, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, to occur before this Court proceeded with this review. With trial approaching

e 09-34791-RBR Doc 6441 Filed 09/04/18 Page 2 of 5 further consultation shall appear at the mediation in person. In addition, a representative of Fowler White's insurance carrier who has full authority to settle in an amount up to its policy limits without further consultation shall appear at the mediation i

4/18 Page 1 of 5 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on September 4, 2018. IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER II Debtor. Raymond B. Ray, Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUIPPeittatr iPtcY Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT Or FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov CASE NO. 09-34791-R

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1194 Filed 11/30/10 Page 1 of 2 ORDERED in lie Southern District of Florida on '11-9)-- O Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Fort Lauderdale Division www.11tuscourts.gov