3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Josefsberg regarding the amount of fees owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr Epstein would meet with him on two occasions between now and March 1 to review Mr. Josefsberg's o
expeditious manner. Again, the Special Master procedure for adjudicating outstanding fee issues was previously approved (and even proposed) by Mr. Jofesberg. We want to assure you that Mr. Epstein fully intends to fulfill his obligations under the NPA. We regret that issues remain unresolved regarding
Josefsberg regarding the amount of fees owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with him on two occasions between now and March 1 to review Mr. Josefsberg's
ttling outstanding issues through a Special Master Agreement nearly identical to the one executed EFTA00725494 today by Mr. Epstein. In fact, Mr. Jofesberg and Mr. Epstein had each agreed in the past to a specific Master as a third party neutral to conduct proceedings to resolve the fee issues however
Josefsberg regarding the amount of fees owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr Epstein would meet with him on two occasions between now and March 1 to review Mr. Josefsberg's o
expeditious manner. Again, the Special Master procedure for adjudicating outstanding fee issues was previously approved (and even proposed) by Mr. Jofesberg. We want to assure you that Mr. Epstein fully intends to fulfill his obligations under the NPA. We regret that issues remain unresolved regarding
Entities connected to both Bob Critton and Jofesberg