Epstein Secrets

299 (11* Cir. 2003); United Stalest. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); United States' Burgess, 175 F.3d j261 (11th Cir. 1999); United States' Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11* Cir. 2005); United States'. Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). United Stalest Murrell, 368 F.3d 1283 (116 Cir. 2004), i

00176572 To be sure, Blair had been a bad egg whose misbehaviors were more flagrant than those of his contemporaries. But at least since publisher Arthur Sulzberger had appointed Raines as managing editor in 2001,a strong set of explicit and implicit signals had been sent to the Times staff. Reporters were told

9 (11° Cir. 2003); United States it Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Burgess,175 F.3d 1261 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11° Cir. 2005); United States it Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). United States it Murrell, 368 F3d 1283 (11th Cir. 2004)

A00284239 To be sure, Blair had been a bad egg whose misbehaviors were more flagrant than those of his contemporaries. But at lent since publisher Arthur Sulzberger had appointed Raines as managing editor in 2001,a strong set of explicit and implicit signals had been sent to the Times staff. Reporters were told

9); United States' Panfil, supra, 338 I 1299 (116 Cii 2003); United States v. 1999); United &awl Burgess, 175 .3d r61(II.Ci 1999); United States! Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11° Cir. 2005); United States Root, 296 3d 1222 (11° Cir. 200 ). United States! Murrell, 368 II3d 1283 (114 Cir. 2004), is i

00226814 To be sure, Blair had been a bad egg whose misbehaviors were more flagrant than those of his contemporaries. But at least since publisher Arthur Sulzberger had appointed Raines as managing editor in 2001,a strong set of explicit and implicit signals had been sent to the Times staff. Reporters were told