6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence
evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e
t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence
evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e
t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence
evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e
t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence
evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e
t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence
evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e
t have already been disclosed. 5. We request the results or reports of any physical or mental examination and of any scientific test or experiment. Fed R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(F). 6. We request a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to introduce at trial under Federal Rules of Evidence
evidence, falls within Brady's definition of evidence favorable to the accused. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985); United States v. Agars, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). We also make the following specific Brady requests: I. Exculpatory Evidence: We request all such evidence requested above and e
Entities connected to both Fed R. Crim and Agars

United States
LOCATION
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Brady
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONThane Ritchie
PERSONBates
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Michael Cohen
PERSON
David Boies
PERSONSigrid McCawley
PERSON
Whitley
PERSONStrifler
PERSON
United States Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONMisconduct of Government Agents
ORGANIZATIONStanley Pottinger
PERSON
New York Daily News
ORGANIZATIONJack Scarola
PERSON