Epstein Secrets

: Cassell is C-a-s-s-e-I-1. 5 THE COURT: And who are you representing in 6 this matter? 7 MR. CASSELL: I represent putative 8 intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc, who have a pending 9 motion for leave to intervene. 10 THE COURT: All right. Let me ask, is there 11 any opposition to the motion

present in the courtroom? 14 MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, I was informed 15 that Mr. Paul Cassell was to call into this hearing on 16 behalf of L.M., E.W. and S.R. 17 THE COURT: I don't --- 18 MR. EDWARDS: I don't know what arrangements 19 he made. 20 THE COURT: No such arrangements were made. 21

he In Re: McClean case, 2 Courts have held, and we've cited them in 2 and countless other 11th Circuit cases, and lower court 3 our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts don't have the inherent 3 cases, that's seeking criminal contempt sanctions, which 4 power to find criminal contempt. 4 I've already discussed

r Shapiro present in the courtroom? MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, I was informed that Mr. Paul Cassell was to call into this hearing on behalf of L.M., E.W. and S.R. THE COURT: I don't MR. EDWARDS: I don't know what arrangements he made. THE COURT: No such arrangements were made. So, we'll just -- on

R. CASSELL: Cassell is C-a-s-s-e-1-1. THE COURT: And who are you representing in this matter? MR. CASSELL: I represent putative intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who have a pending motion for leave to intervene. THE COURT: All right. Let me ask, is there any opposition to the motion to interve

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 29 provisions of Title 11. Courts have held, and we've cited them in our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts don't have the inherent power to find criminal contempt. Now based on the facts that I just laid out, I don't think there could ever be a basis fo

e any detail—much less an unequivocal command—as to what Fowler White is to do with the disc at issue. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Although L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe have sought to join in the motion for order to show cause, they have not been granted leave to intervene in this action. The motion to

ontempt powers only to Article III judges and that magistrates are not empowered to try criminal proceedings. As a result, the court concluded that Bankruptcy Courts do not have the inherent power to consider criminal contempt sanctions. See also In re Lickman, 288 B.R. 291, 292-93 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003)(as Art