Epstein Secrets

r Shapiro present in the courtroom? MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, I was informed that Mr. Paul Cassell was to call into this hearing on behalf of L.M., E.W. and S.R. THE COURT: I don't MR. EDWARDS: I don't know what arrangements he made. THE COURT: No such arrangements were made. So, we'll just -- on

R. CASSELL: Cassell is C-a-s-s-e-1-1. THE COURT: And who are you representing in this matter? MR. CASSELL: I represent putative intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, who have a pending motion for leave to intervene. THE COURT: All right. Let me ask, is there any opposition to the motion to interve

rs, which ended up with the order that we're talking about today. Another point of clarification, Mr. Scarola says that the order was entered over Farmer Jaffe's objection. He may have had some -- the law firm may have had some concerns, but it's very clear it's an agreed order. I don't know that that makes

ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 Debtor. INTERVENORS L.M., E.W.. AND JANE DOE'S LIST OF REOUESTED RELIEF SOUGHT IN THIS CASE Intervenors L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (hereinafter "the Victims"), proceeding pseudonymously, having previously been allowed to intervene in this action, and having part

edies as the Court may find just and proper. CONCLUSION The Court should grant the three Victims' the relief requested above, including joinder in Farmer Jaffe's motion for sanctions and their own sanctions and other relief, for reasons as described in DE 6345 and DE 6357, as well as Farmer Jaffe's related pl

CARLTON FIELDS, BY NIALL McLACHLAN, Esquire On behalf of Fowler White Barnett, P.A. PAUL G. CASSELL, Esquire (via telephone) On behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe EDWARDS POTTINGER, by BRITTANY HENDERSON, Esquire On behalf of Farmer Jaffe Weissing ALSO PRESENT ECRO - Electronic Court Reporting

have knowledge of the custody of the disk, but there was no reference to production of documents, as was specifically requested in Mr. Edwards or Farmer Jaffe's motion. In addition, Judge, we believe that the scope of what Mr. Edwards is seeking is almost ridiculously overbroad. His request, essentially,

e any detail—much less an unequivocal command—as to what Fowler White is to do with the disc at issue. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Although L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe have sought to join in the motion for order to show cause, they have not been granted leave to intervene in this action. The motion to

ONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby responds to Farmer Jaffe's Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court, to Permit Discovery, to

or armer affe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Peter E. Shapiro Counsel for L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe Niall T. McLachlan Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Isaac M. Marcushamer Coun

there had been a waiver of any privilege with regard to documents contained on the disc that permitted you to file documents that were included on Farmer Jaffe's privilege log. Ianno (Fowler White's counsel): And I want to add my objection that that has nothing whatsoever to do with the motion, the order or

to have dealt with this issue head on because of the apparent implications of same." Hearing Trans. at 60:20-61:14. 33. Counsel for victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe also asked Judge Hafele to order Fowler White to explain who they had distributed the confidential materials to. Judge Hafele indicat

Strike Epstein's Untimely Supplemental Exhibits and to Strike all Exhibits and Any Reference to Documents Containing Privileged Materials Listed on Farmer Jaffe's Privilege Log. 23. On March 7, 2018, L.M. and two other minor girls Epstein had sexually abused, E.W. and Jane Doe, filed an emergency motion to i