Epstein Secrets

ons, and in support thereof, states: INTRODUCTION Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), along with Fanner Jaffe and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (collectively, the "Bankruptcy Movants") have moved the Bankruptcy Court for an Order to show cause why a November 2010 Agreed Order' h

e Production of All Documents in Response to His Requests Filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-RBR [D.E. 1194]. EFTA00805483 that Fowler White had

ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., CHAPTER 11 Debtor. INTERVENORS L.M., E.W.. AND JANE DOE'S LIST OF REOUESTED RELIEF SOUGHT IN THIS CASE Intervenors L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe" (hereinafter "the Victims"), proceeding pseudonymously, having previously been allowed to intervene in this action, and having part

6384 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 6 Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. See DE 1194, In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeld: Adler, P.A., No. 09-34791-RBR. If you are in possession of any of the attached documents as a consequence of a violation of the order, you are re

ls are attorney-client privileged communications between Edwards (or any other co-counsel) and Edwards' and Mr. Cassell's three tort clients (L.M., E.W. or Jane Doe). Rather, the majority of the documents are e- mails among attorneys and staff within RRA, with Mr. Cassell, and with media sources and d

illustrated in the hearing transcript before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-BKC- RBR, in In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by William Scherer, Razorback's counsel: • "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Co