Epstein Secrets

"case" as "a question contested before a court of justice"). This general understanding is equally applicable to criminal proceedings. In Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (2005), the Supreme Court held that a criminal "case" — as distinct from an investigation — "at the very least requires the initiation

2008, with the filing of Petitioner's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act (DE1), and a Certificate of Emergency (DE2).' The Emergency Petition noted that Jeffrey Epstein had recently pled guilty to state court criminal charges (DE1 at 1.) The Petition then alleged: 3. Upon information and

"case" as "a question contested before a court of justice"). This general understanding is equally applicable to criminal proceedings. In Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (2005), the Supreme Court held that a criminal "case" — as distinct from an investigation — "at the very least requires the initiation

2008, with the filing of Petitioner's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act (DEl), and a Certificate of Emergency (DE2).' The Emergency Petition noted that Jeffrey Epstein had recently pled guilty to state court criminal charges (DE1 at 1.) The Petition then alleged: 3. Upon information and

rc "merely a statement of assertion or concession made for some independent purpose," and may be controverted or explained by the party who made it. Martinez I Bally's Louisiana, Inc., 244 F.3d 474, 476-77 (51° Cir. 2001), citing McNamara v. Miller, 269 F.2d 511, 515 (D.C. Cir. 1959). In contrast, a judi

2008, with the filing of Petitioner's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act (DEI), and a Certificate of Emergency (DE2).' The Emergency Petition noted that Jeffrey Epstein had recently pled guilty to state court criminal charges (DEI at 1.) The Petition then alleged: 3. Upon information and