Epstein Secrets

ited in the DOJ Report. See DOJ Report at 38-39 nn.20-24. " See DOJ Report at 28 (discussing multiple algorithmic measures of racial bias). 15 See Melissa Hamilton, Debating Algorithmic Fairness, 52 UC DAVIS L REV. ONLINE 261 (2019); Jay P. Singh, Predictive Validi?Perfonnance Indicators in Violent Risk Assessm

statistical experts, current and formerly incarcerated individuals, public defenders, public prosecutors, judges, and civil rights organizations"); Danielle Kehl et al., Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System 34 (2017), https:/ /dash.harvard.edu/ bitstream/ handle/1 /33746041 /2017- 07_responsivecommunities_2.pd

ited in the DOJ Report. See DOJ Report at 38-39 nn.20-24. " See DOJ Report at 28 (discussing multiple algorithmic measures of racial bias). 15 See Melissa Hamilton, Debating Algorithmic Fairness, 52 UC DAVIS L REV. ONLINE 261 (2019); Jay P. Singh, Predictive Validi?Perfonnance Indicators in Violent Risk Assessm

statistical experts, current and formerly incarcerated individuals, public defenders, public prosecutors, judges, and civil rights organizations"); Danielle Kehl et al., Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System 34 (2017), https:/ /dash.harvard.edu/ bitstream/ handle/1 /33746041 /2017- 07_responsivecommunities_2.pd

ited in the DOJ Report. See DOJ Report at 38-39 nn.20-24. " See DOJ Report at 28 (discussing multiple algorithmic measures of racial bias). 15 See Melissa Hamilton, Debating Algorithmic Fairness, 52 UC DAVIS L REV. ONLINE 261 (2019); Jay P. Singh, Predictive Validi?Perfonnance Indicators in Violent Risk Assessm

statistical experts, current and formerly incarcerated individuals, public defenders, public prosecutors, judges, and civil rights organizations"); Danielle Kehl et al., Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System 34 (2017), https:/ /dash.harvard.edu/ bitstream/ handle/1 /33746041 /2017- 07_responsivecommunities_2.pd