7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
, serious charges, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence, the defendant proposes to be released on conditions that are woefully inadequate. The Release Motion misconstrues and misunderstands the relevant EFTA00100380 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14 Honorable Richard M. Ber
s in the District of South Dakota, United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11 Cr. 40016, 2012 WL 13704 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012), and United States v. Jungers, II Cr. 40018, 2011 WL 6046495 (D.S.D. Dec. 5, 2011), both of which were explicitly overruled by the Eighth Circuit decision in Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066. In
, serious charges, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence, the defendant proposes to be released on conditions that are woefully inadequate. The Release Motion misconstrues and misunderstands the relevant EFTA00105478 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14 Honorable Richard M. Ber
s in the District of South Dakota, United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11 Cr. 40016, 2012 WL 13704 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012), and United States v. Jungers, II Cr. 40018, 2011 WL 6046495 (D.S.D. Dec. 5, 2011), both of which were explicitly overruled by the Eighth Circuit decision in Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066. In
, serious charges, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence, the defendant proposes to be released on conditions that are woefully inadequate. The Release Motion misconstrues and misunderstands the relevant EFTA00071674 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14 Honorable Richard M. Ber
s in the District of South Dakota, United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11 Cr. 40016, 2012 WL 13704 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012), and United States v. Jungers, II Cr. 40018, 2011 WL 6046495 (D.S.D. Dec. 5, 2011), both of which were explicitly overruled by the Eighth Circuit decision in Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066. In
, serious charges, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence, the defendant proposes to be released on conditions that are woefully inadequate. The Release Motion misconstrues and misunderstands the relevant EFTA00076359 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14 Honorable Richard M. Ber
s in the District of South Dakota, United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11 Cr. 40016, 2012 WL 13704 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012), and United States v. Jungers, II Cr. 40018, 2011 WL 6046495 (D.S.D. Dec. 5, 2011), both of which were explicitly overruled by the Eighth Circuit decision in Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066. In
, serious charges, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence, the defendant proposes to be released on conditions that are woefully inadequate. The Release Motion misconstrues and misunderstands the relevant EFTA00078231 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14 Honorable Richard M. Ber
s in the District of South Dakota, United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11 Cr. 40016, 2012 WL 13704 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012), and United States v. Jungers, II Cr. 40018, 2011 WL 6046495 (D.S.D. Dec. 5, 2011), both of which were explicitly overruled by the Eighth Circuit decision in Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066. In
, serious charges, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence, the defendant proposes to be released on conditions that are woefully inadequate. The Release Motion misconstrues and misunderstands the relevant EFTA00080486 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14 Honorable Richard M. Ber
s in the District of South Dakota, United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11 Cr. 40016, 2012 WL 13704 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012), and United States v. Jungers, II Cr. 40018, 2011 WL 6046495 (D.S.D. Dec. 5, 2011), both of which were explicitly overruled by the Eighth Circuit decision in Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066. In
, serious charges, and the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence, the defendant proposes to be released on conditions that are woefully inadequate. The Release Motion misconstrues and misunderstands the relevant EFTA00089393 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11 Filed 07/12/19 Page 2 of 14 Honorable Richard M. Ber
s in the District of South Dakota, United States v. Bonestroo, No. 11 Cr. 40016, 2012 WL 13704 (D.S.D. Jan. 4, 2012), and United States v. Jungers, II Cr. 40018, 2011 WL 6046495 (D.S.D. Dec. 5, 2011), both of which were explicitly overruled by the Eighth Circuit decision in Jungers, 702 F.3d 1066. In
Entities connected to both The Release Motion and II Cr
Fierro v. Taylor
PERSONKazeem
PERSONBotero
PERSONValerio
PERSONZarrab
PERSONOrena
PERSONBorodin
PERSONNickerson
PERSONBonestroo
PERSONJungers
PERSONMikoloyck
PERSONThe Second Circuit
ORGANIZATIONThe Silvio J. Mollo Building
ORGANIZATIONCilins
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONEmmy Taylor
PERSONSDFL to Epstein
ORGANIZATIONW.D. Tenn. 2004
ORGANIZATIOND.D.C. Mar. 15, 2018
ORGANIZATIONThe Defendant Provides No Assurance
ORGANIZATION