Epstein Secrets

rital assets. For that reason, the Court cannot find that Mr. Francis excessively spent and wasted marital assets in 2011 and 2012, in violation of the Court Order entered on December 23, 2011. For internal use only SDNY_GM_00057230 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020054 EFTA_00 16

be sufficient evidence that a party intentionally disobeyed a Court order to be held in contempt. To clarify its position, The Walters Court quotes the Court of the Second Circuit of Appeals: [FIN 10] "A party may be held in civil contempt for failure to comply with a court order if '(1) the order the contemnor failed to comp

rital assets. For that reason, the Court cannot find that Mr. Francis excessively spent and wasted marital assets in 2011 and 2012, in violation of the Court Order entered on December 23, 2011. CONCLUSION Based [" 33] on all of the above the Court concludes that both parties individually possess sufficient fi

be sufficient evidence that a party intentionally disobeyed a Court order to be held in contempt. To clarify its position, The Walters Court quotes the Court of the Second Circuit of Appeals: [HN10] "A party may be held in civil contempt for failure to comply with a court order if '(1) the order the contemnor failed to comply

rital assets. For that reason, the Court cannot find that Mr. Francis excessively spent and wasted marital assets in 2011 and 2012, in violation of the Court Order entered on December 23, 2011. For internal use only CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0053313 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_001994

be sufficient evidence that a party intentionally disobeyed a Court order to be held in contempt. To clarify its position, The Walters Court quotes the Court of the Second Circuit of Appeals: [HN10] "A party may be held in civil contempt for failure to comply with a court order if '(1) the order the contemnor failed to comply