Epstein Secrets

uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends

uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends

uments dated fully two years apart. The People's evidence on remand would include proof that defendant had engaged in aggressive negotiations with the Palm Beach State's Attorney's Office even before indictment; that, after the State's Attorney's Office obtained a single-count indictment, Florida federal authorities

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends