5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
14: 2017: Seller composition breakdown6l Exhibit 15: Funds marketed by vintage58 100% 20% General Partners 24% Endowments & Foundations 16% Family Office / Other 6% 80% 60% 58% 40% Financial Institutions 12% Asset Manager / FoF 18% 0% 2016 Public Pensions / SWF 24% 2017 20% 22% 18%
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
14: 2017: Seller composition breakdown6l Exhibit 15: Funds marketed by vintage58 100% 20% General Partners 24% Endowments & Foundations 16% Family Office / Other 6% 80% 60% 58% 40% Financial Institutions 12% Asset Manager / FoF 18% 0% 2016 Public Pensions / SWF 24% 2017 20% 22% 18%
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
14: 2017: Seller composition breakdown6l Exhibit 15: Funds marketed by vintage58 100% 20% General Partners 24% Endowments & Foundations 16% Family Office / Other 6% 80% 60% 58% 40% Financial Institutions 12% Asset Manager / FoF 18% 0% 2016 Public Pensions / SWF 24% 2017 20% 22% 18%
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
14: 2017: Seller composition breakdown6l Exhibit 15: Funds marketed by vintage58 100% 20% General Partners 24% Endowments & Foundations 16% Family Office / Other 6% 80% 60% 58% 40% Financial Institutions 12% Asset Manager / FoF 18% 0% 2016 Public Pensions / SWF 24% 2017 20% 22% 18%
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
14: 2017: Seller composition breakdown6l Exhibit 15: Funds marketed by vintage58 100% 20% General Partners 24% Endowments & Foundations 16% Family Office / Other 6% 80% 60% 58% 40% Financial Institutions 12% Asset Manager / FoF 18% 0% 2016 Public Pensions / SWF 24% 2017 20% 22% 18%
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
Entities connected to both Family Office and the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark
Glendower
LOCATIONSOF IV
ORGANIZATION
New York
LOCATION
Prince Charles
PERSONAdam Graev
PERSON
Malta
LOCATION
Hungary
LOCATION
Belgium
LOCATION
Estonia
LOCATION
Denmark
LOCATION
Finland
LOCATIONPretoria
LOCATION
George Soros
PERSON
Michael Douglas
PERSON
European Union
ORGANIZATION
Romania
LOCATION
Lithuania
LOCATION
Cyprus
LOCATION
Elena
PERSON
Northern Ireland
LOCATION